Showing posts with label Fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fiction. Show all posts

Monday, December 6, 2021

Micro Mention "The Jungle Book"

Rudyard Kipling


Since I was a wee insufferable lad, I've seen Disney's interpretation of "The Jungle Book" probably over a hundred times. So when I finally got around to reading the source material by Rudyard Kipling, imagine my surprise when I discovered that they really aren't all that similar—at all.

I'm not sure why that surprised me. After all, that's sort of Disney's thing when you consider their interpretations of the Brothers Grimm. The book is a series of short stories revolving around Mowgli and isn't one long continuous narrative. Sure they all fit together, but they each have independent arcs separate from the overarching plot.

The setting and characters are a curious choice for a man like Kipling, other than the fact he was an English man, and they all had strong opinions about India, especially back then. But as charming as these stories are, and surprising as it is that our protagonist is an Indian boy named Mowgli, take it with a grain of salt that this was for any sort of early progressive reason. Kipling would soon go on to write something called "The White Man's Burden," which is precisely what it sounds like. 



This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.


Thursday, September 30, 2021

Talking In Obscurity, "The Outsider," by Stephen King

Stephen King





Or Download This Episode Here:


We're at the end of September, Obscurists! So Steven and I thought since we're heading into the spooky season, we'd kick things off right with a Stephen King book.

"The Outsider" is a mix between police procedural, murder mystery, and straight-up horror. We hope you enjoy hearing our thoughts on it!



This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Author's Website: https://stephenking.com/

Monday, September 27, 2021

Micro Mention "Ramsey's Gold"

Russell Blake


I'm going to level. I mainly bought "Ramsey's Gold" because it was a daily deal on Audible, and Ray Porter read it—and it was fine. An amusing way to while away a few hours, but I couldn't get out of my head that I was reading a novel about "Uncharted."

I don't read many, just straight contemporary action-adventure novel's so admittedly, this is a departure for me. I've seen some people review this book as being like Indiana Jones, and I guess there are some similarities. Still, Drake Ramsey, other than being an American treasure hunter, isn't all that similar to Indiana, in my opinion. That isn't a good or bad observation. I just thought it was important to clarify. The adventure was like one of Indiana's, but the man himself is different.

Ray Porter, of course, is fantastic as always if you go in for the audio version, and I think you should if you're going to pick this one up.



This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Author's Website: https://russellblake.com/


Wednesday, July 21, 2021

Micro Mention "Breakfast At Tiffany's"

Truman Capote


"Breakfast at Tiffany's" by Truman Capote is one of those short classics that I didn't know if I liked it initially, which is probably intentional. There is something about Capote's gossamer writing that keeps you invested and it's narrated brilliantly by Michael C. Hall—it got to me at the end.

I think what kept me invested beyond Capote's writing is the manic energy he infused in every character, even the narrator. They're all out to do—something, even if they're not sure what. It's like watching ambitious twenty-somethings all ping-ponging off of each other, not sure where they're going or what they want, but they know they want to get there fast. Also, and I talk about this more in my full review, which you can find here, but a lot of the characters feel like archetypical people you meet throughout life.



This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.


Friday, April 23, 2021

"The Picture of Dorian Gray" by Oscar Wilde--Fiction Review

For today’s review, I thought we would go old school and talk about a classic supernatural horror story by Oscar Wilde, “The Picture of Dorian Gray,” and despite the rumors, I don’t have my own portrait moldering away in some locked room. It’s in my parlor. I like to look at that shit. 


Oscar Wilde


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review***


What I love about this book:

“The Picture of Dorian Gray” has that Victorian-era gothic aura about it that you can also get a taste of in Charles Dickens, Henry James, and Emily Brontë’s work. It’s a quality that is probably my favorite thing about writers of this period—their predilection for evoking the supernatural. Unlike the famous works of those writers, the narrative of this story doesn’t involve ghosts but rather revolves around a Faustian bargain the protagonist makes regarding a portrait of him. 

Wilde makes some deep meditative points regarding Victorian society’s philosophy on the world in this novel. And if ever there was a group of people who didn’t take to criticism well, it was the Victorians—so I admire the bravery of that since they were also his primary audience.

Plus, on a far baser level, there is just something fun about the idea of you can do anything, and none of the consequences of your actions will touch you. They’ll just jack up some portrait of you. 


What I don’t love about this book:

For a guy who might be immortal—or at least doesn’t suffer consequences—not a lot happens on stage in this book. There are a lot of conversations about Dorian Gray’s wild behavior and a lot of allusions to what he gets up to as a functional immortal, but precious little action. This is really just true of the era stylistically. Novels and stories of his time tend to be sedate even when they involve supernatural monsters.

Dorian Gray is really one of those archetypical characters who, when granted eternal youth, nearly immediately goes full dickhead. Why does nobody who gets one of these bargains ever just live a life of quiet, industrious virtue? Probably the devil—well, I guess I answered my own question there.



This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.


***The Spoiler part of this review***
***Ye be warned to turn back now***


The quick and dirty synopsis:

At the beginning of the story, Dorian Gray is modeling for Basil Hallward, a painter painting Dorian’s portrait. Through this painter, Dorian becomes acquainted with Lord Henry Wotton, the consummate hedonist, and in many ways, the antithesis of the moralizing Hallward. Somewhere amidst the conversation between the three, Dorian expresses a wish that the painting should suffer the effects of time in his stead, and he should remain forever youthful.

Wednesday, March 31, 2021

Micro Mention "The Good Girl"

Mary Kubica


The Good Girl” by Mary Kubica is one of those psychological thrillers that, while it can be uncomfortable at times, once you start, you need to know how it turns out.

For me, no matter how you frame a story that involves a kind of Stockholm syndrome as a central element, I'm creeped out by that story. So if the goal is to get me to emotionally bond with the hostage-taker like the victim, to vicariously live out that experience, that effect has never worked on me yet. Without spoiling too much here, to be frank, it didn't work on me in this either, even after the final big reveal.


This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Author's Website: https://marykubica.com/

Friday, March 19, 2021

"Room" by Emma Donoghue--Fiction Review

For today’s review, I thought we’d go with a book that’s a children’s story—if you’re a terrible parent—seriously, while “Room” by Emma Donoghue is an excellent novel with a five-year-old protagonist, don’t give it to your kids to read. 


Emma Donoghue


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review***


What I love about this book:

Donoghue’s skill with establishing and maintaining a consistent character voice is unparalleled. Writing this entire novel from the perspective of and narrated by a five-year-old boy and make it feel authentic while telling a story that isn’t just good but gripping—is nothing short of amazing. I’ve never seen anyone do character voice better, and honestly, you should read this novel for just that reason. Sure, there are seams in the illusion in any creation, but her characters are so good any defect in believability is barely noticeable.   

This book is an emotional tour de force from start to finish, and I love that it never lets up. I mean that it doesn’t end where you would naturally assume it would, and a lesser book would have. I’m tiptoeing around here because I don’t want to spoil too much yet. Suffice to say, for a book about a kidnapped young woman being held against her will while raising her son, the narrative addresses the obvious emotional struggles and some not so obvious.

The sense of tension in this novel is masterful. It waxes and wanes, ebbs and flows, but it’s always present in every scene. Since this story is a character study of this little boy and his mother obviously going through an incredibly tragic circumstance that is also quite unique—as life experiences go—those two characters are the center of focus, the whole world of the story. For me, this endeared them to me quickly and made me want the best for them, which made me incredibly uncomfortable—in an excellent narrative way—when their happiness and even their very lives were being threatened.

Specific to the audiobook version of this story, the version I have has a full voice cast, which is something I’ve brought up before that I love. 


What I don’t love about this book:

In the second half of the book, there are many characters where I feel like their emotional intelligence—or hell, even their imagination—seems to be awfully stunted. There were a couple times where I was like, you’re medical professionals, how can you be this bad at getting what these people have gone through?

All of the side characters beyond the primary pair range from O.K. to above average, which is good—but for a book with a protagonist whose characterization sparkles—it’s a bit odd that the secondary cast of characters just does their job. This is a tempered complaint, though, because I didn’t feel there was a weak link amongst them. I certainly didn’t like grandpa, but you’re not supposed to like grandpa because he’s terrible. I did like step-grandpa or steppa, as Jack calls him. He genuinely seems to be doing his best, which isn’t true for everyone.

I’m no fan of the rape in this story, which, you know, is essential to the narrative—but still, it makes you feel icky. That is the point, though. So I wouldn’t have suggested removing or even changing that aspect of the story.   



This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.



***The Spoiler part of this review***
***Ye be warned to turn back now***


The quick and dirty synopsis:

“Room,” starts with Jack talking about his and his Ma’s day in room. He describes their lives together, and it’s clear pretty early on that something is odd about this situation. It’s pretty amazing that the fact that Jack, who has just turned five at the beginning of the story, is so upbeat because it’s apparent that he’s spent his entire life from birth to his fifth birthday in this one room.

Friday, February 26, 2021

"Crooked Kingdom," by Leigh Bardugo--Fiction Review

So for this review, Obscurists, we’re returning to Leigh Bardugo’s Grishaverse in her dark epic fantasy “Crooked Kingdom.” Characters from which will be featured in a new Netflix show “Shadow and Bone” coming out this April.  


Leigh Bardugo


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review***


What I love about this book:

Sometimes sequels don’t quite match up to the first story, like “Ghostbusters 2,” for example. In trying to recapture the original’s magic, they end up telling the first story again, but slightly different. That is emphatically not the case with “Crooked Kingdom,” which, in my opinion, addresses all of my minor issues with “Six of Crows” and tells a whole new story. Again—in my opinion—it is a far superior book to its predecessor.

I felt that the city of Ketterdam is a far better setting than the Ice Court and was thrilled that this is where all the action of this story takes place. Ketterdam has all the intrigue and political machinations on both sides of the law. It’s a dynamic place, a melting pot of a variety of peoples created by Bardugo. Whereas the Ice Court, in Fjerda, certainly had a lot of ice—that—and blonde-haired blue-eyed barbarians. As a blonde-haired, green-eyed barbarian, meself, I know these people already, I’d rather hang out in Ketterdam.

“Crooked Kingdom” turned me around on Wylan and Jesper’s relationship. In the first book, I felt it was tacked on, but in this, I thought it might have been the healthiest romantic subplot of the bunch. This further development of the characters was really done well, and Bardugo doesn’t try to re-review old territory with her characters. Since she didn’t have to introduce her characters, she had far more time to develop them further and deepen their individual arcs.    


What I don’t love about this book:

One character in this book I didn’t like and didn’t feel contributed much in the narrative, despite becoming the central McGuffin at the end of “Six of Crows,” and throughout this novel, was Kuwei Yul-Bo. Kuwei is vital to the plot because of what he might be able to do—not because of who he is as a person, which is mainly an ungrateful catty prick. I get it—he wants his freedom to go where he chooses and resents Kaz for using him as a chip in the big game of nation-states—see how I didn’t say thrones there? Oh, shit, I just did—damn it. 

But anyway, back on topic; why I don’t like Kuwei is because he annoyingly goes on about how he’s being treated by the dregs. He complains incessantly, without really acknowledging that without the dregs and Kaz, he’d be back at the Ice Court, in a cell, forced to create what amounts to a weapon of mass destruction for a bunch of people just one shade away from Nazi. 

This is a minor quibble, and it’s more my fault than anything, but we get introduced to characters from a previous story in this novel, from a different trilogy, and I get the sense that there is a lot of depth to them that I’m missing because I haven’t read those stories yet. This is the crux of why I don’t like reading things out of order. I want to understand each character’s story in precisely the manner and order it was intended. But again, this is what I get for having read the “Six of Crows” duology first before the “Shadow & Bone” trilogy, and I really only have myself to blame.  



This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.


***The Spoiler part of this review***
***Ye be warned to turn back now***


The quick and dirty synopsis:

“Crooked Kingdom” starts off right where the last book left off, Kaz and crew have just pulled off an impossible heist, and their employer betrayed them, kidnapping Inej, who is Kaz’s love interest from the first book. The merchant gives Kaz and the dregs an ultimatum, give him Kuwei, which really means the secret of Jurda Parem, the most dangerous substance in the world, for Inej. 

Friday, February 19, 2021

"Breakfast at Tiffany's," by Truman Capote--Fiction Review

This week let’s head back in time with an old classic. Take in that old New York feel of the 1940s with Truman Capote’s “Breakfast at Tiffany’s.” 


Truman Capote


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review***


What I love about this book:

How Capote constructs this story, from a technical perspective, is ingenious. It’s written in the first person from the POV of a character who isn’t the story’s protagonist. Not only that, but his name is never given. That’s a hard trick to pull off and could go wrong in several ways. I believe that’s also why this story is a relatively short novella.

Holly Golightly, the true protagonist of this story—the character in which the plot pivots around—initially is an unlikeable protagonist. By the end, I softened on her. Here’s the thing, though, not because she learns anything or even significantly changes her ways. Holly is just that compelling in how firm she holds to her character.

Capote also captures the feeling of a New York of yesteryear and crystalizes it in his prose. All of the principal characters in this story are complex creations that often express conflicting values, which I feel is emblematic of the war years of WW2.


What I don’t love about this book:

On the flip side, this is definitely a story that dates itself in an unpleasant way regarding race and sexuality—hint, it’s got that cavalier use of derogatory terms, which was all the rage in the 1950s. I’m not suggesting that Capote was a racist or homophobic. After all, he was an openly gay man at a tough time to be a gay man. My impression of him, which comes across in this story, is that he was very preoccupied with the sensational. If a little offense was needed to get that shock value, so be it.      

Without spoiling too much here in the non-spoiler part, but there is a bit with Holly’s cat that I found incredibly sad. It doesn’t get hurt or anything—nothing like that—it’s just that I am especially prone to sad animal moments. 



This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.


***The Spoiler part of this review***
***Ye be warned to turn back now***


The quick and dirty synopsis:

The story begins with our unnamed narrator, a writer, having a conversation with a bartender about a mutual—friend—love? It’s hard to tell with how they talk about Holly. What’s clear is they miss her, and she seems to have fled the country.

Friday, January 15, 2021

"Epic of Gilgamesh," by Unknown & Translated by Stephen Mitchell--Fiction Review

Today let’s go old school and dig up a classic from antiquity. We’re discussing the “Epic of Gilgamesh” by—hmmm, this is awkward—I don’t know, nobody does, well who originally wrote the story that is, the narrative suggests Gilgamesh himself wrote the epic as several books. Later a scribe named Sîn-lÄ“qi-unninni compiled them together. The translator, though, for my copy is Stephen Mitchell.


Stephen Mitchell


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review*** 


What I love about this book:

So in terms of origin stories, this is it for the western literary canon. What I mean by that is that all other works of literature in the west take place after the “Epic of Gilgamesh.” That’s pretty cool when you think about it for a moment. This Sumerian epic carved into stone in Mesopotamia is the starting point of literature in the west, and you can read it! Ok, maybe it’s just exciting to me because I’m a huge nerd. Also, it is fair to argue that the “Epic of Gilgamesh” is really literature of the near east/middle east, and making the claim that it represents the oldest work of western literature a little wibbly-wobbly. Still, it is one I'm sticking with because of how it references antediluvian times. That is before the great flood, suggesting a tie to the biblical story about the flood, and the bible, which undergirds the western tradition.  

Some of the scenes describing Gilgamesh’s armor and weapons, plus his adventures to places like the Garden of the Gods where the trees are described as being made of gems, sound a lot like something that could come right out of Brandon Sanderson’s “The Stormlight Archive.” Full disclosure, I happened to be reading this and that at the same time, so maybe I was just primed to make that connection, but still, I think it works.

One of the petty little details that I love about this epic is that Gilgamesh isn’t a half-god, unlike all the others that discuss demi-gods. No, it’s specifically mentioned that he’s two-thirds a god—with little explanation on how that happens, other than his mother was a goddess and his father became a god. It’s not like this was in response—that we know of—to other myths about demi-gods because the “Epic of Gilgamesh” is the first one written down, well, chiseled in rock, to be precise.


What I don’t love about this book:

Gilgamesh is heralded at the beginning of this story as a great king, you know, other than the times he randomly CRUSHES people’s sons to death. He also takes an—shall we say—overly amorous approach to women, especially other people’s wives, on their wedding night. So king rapist, the first, isn’t what you would call a likable character at the start of the story.

Shocker, as a character, Gilgamesh is often hard to love. Part of this is thousands of years of separation in time and human culture, though, so allowances need to be made. That being said, I don’t feel that he learns a whole lot on his adventures, despite the narration assuring me that he felt and experienced all things. Whatever that means. To me, Gilgamesh represents a proto-king, really still a holdover in form and function from the chieftain of a smaller hunter-gatherer society. Just because he represents the leader of a more settled community doesn’t imply he’s enlightened in any way, which he’s not.

There is also some confusion over how many books (chapters in old-timey) are in the “Epic of Gilgamesh.” There is one that seemingly resurrects a character, without much explanation, or rhyme, or reason. It doesn’t fit in well with the rest of the epic, so for the most part, I ignore its nonsensical plot that doesn’t jive with the rest of the story.

 

This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.


***The Spoiler part of this review*** 
***Ye be warned to turn back now*** 


The quick and dirty synopsis:

We start the epic by being assured that Gilgamesh, the legendary king of Uruk, is a great king like I said before, but things could be better. The people would really like him to stop murdering their sons and having sex with their wives on their wedding nights—reasonable requests. So they cry out to the gods for help in the matter.

Friday, October 23, 2020

"The Outsider," by Stephen King--Fiction Review

I’m a huge Stephen King fan—I know, shocker—so I’ve resisted doing the obvious thing and jumping in on a review of one of his books early on after starting this blog. However, we’re closing in on Halloween, and I feel like now is the time. So today, we’re talking about “The Outsider” by Stephen King. 


Stephen King


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review***


What I love about this book:

Stephen King has mastered a variety of small American townie voices that always seem to populate his novels. It’s genuinely impressive, and one of his literary talents I don’t think gets enough praise, and sure—he’s thought of as the master of the macabre and horror, but his skill with character voice is nearly peerless.

King, in my experience, is a master at setting up a story. He develops that plot through the middle with fascinating and diverse characters, ramping up the tension—then introduces elements at the end like a giant cosmic space turtle or we’re going to defeat the evil clown with tongue biting, metaphorically, or maybe not. What I’m trying to get at is endings are not really known as his thing. It’s a cliché to point that out—so why go on about this in this section? Because “The Outsider” has an actual end, one that I found satisfying, too. 

This book isn’t just a partnership between Detective Ralph Anderson and Holly Gibney—a character he established in other books of his—but none-the-less I enjoyed their inverse X-files partnership a whole lot. I was always a big fan of that show, and this novel really scratches that itch, unlike many actual X-files novels that feel vaguely parody-like to me.   


What I don’t love about this book:

Speaking of X-files, at a certain point, just like in that show, I became wearied by Detective Anderson’s agent Scully-Esque constant insistence on there being a “rational” explanation even after some serious supernatural shit has gone down. I know this is a seemingly weird position for me to take because often I’ve written about how I am such a person who is always seeking a rational answer to things, and decrying magical thinking or reasoning is bullshit. I, however, have never claimed that I would make a good fictional character. I would be that smug jerk who dies right at the beginning of the horror story saying something like, “c’mon guys, demon vampire ghosts aren’t real!” 



This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Author's Website: https://stephenking.com/

***The Spoiler part of this review***
***Ye be warned to turn back now***


The quick and dirty synopsis:

The book begins bouncing between scenes of various witnesses being interviewed by the police and Detective Ralph Anderson and his team on their way to arrest a popular little league coach Terry Maitland. Maitland is a family man and a local school teacher in addition to being a little league coach and is beloved and respected around the community. Now he is suspected of raping and murdering a little boy.

Friday, September 11, 2020

"Wuthering Heights," by Emily Bronte--Fiction Review

Let’s be romantic this Friday, my beloved obscure readers, with Emily Bronte’s “Wuthering Heights,” a book about love, hate, and occasionally ghosts—for some reason. 

Emily Bronte


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review***


What I love about this book:

I love a good ghost story, and even though that aspect of the story isn’t the main focus of the tale, it’s still a major component. This book begins and ends on this note, though, which speaks to my love of horror. The supernatural element is one of the reasons I like this era of novelists from time to time—for example, and more famously, Charles Dickens was known to throw in ghosts into his stories, and he lived at the same time as Emily Bronte. It was often treated as mental furniture in the background, like today we’re talking about interwoven love stories, set amongst a generational family drama—and oh yeah, ghosts are totally real and about, but don’t focus on that.    

Unlike many romances set in Victorian or Victorianesque times and places, where the protagonists usually fall in and out of love because of simple misunderstandings but in the end are typically good people at heart—“Wuthering Heights” doesn’t do that. They’re certainly complex characters, and I found myself even sympathizing with all of them at various points. Most of them share one defining character trait, though—they’re all miserable bastards. It’s hard to say why I love this about them, but there’s just some morbid, ephemeral quality about Bronte’s characters that I like. They’re like passionate shooting stars, and that passion could be love, or more often than not, bitter hate.   


What I don’t love about this book:

Emily Bronte died young, and this is her only novel, which is upsetting because, as far as first novels go, “Wuthering Heights” promises a grand career for Bronte, which sadly never came to pass. It isn’t that it’s set up for a sequel or anything. Her writing is just so compelling that I would have wanted to see what she would have done next in novel-length. 

On to the weakest character of this novel, Lockwood, who is the principal protagonist we’re viewing events through at the beginning of the book and the end of the novel, isn’t really a character. He’s a story device—specifically, his function is to be told the story of the various inhabitants of Wuthering Heights. This makes him feel vestigial at best. We learn a few things about his character in the beginning, but ultimately since he isn’t in most of the narrative, it’s easy to forget he exists.


This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

***The Spoiler part of this review***
***Ye be warned to turn back now***

Friday, August 7, 2020

"Devolution," by Max Brooks--Guest Fiction Review By: James Reinhardt

In 2003, author Max Brooks burst onto the scene with “The Zombie Survival Guide.” Right at the perfect cultural moment, catching a wave of revived interest in the zombie sub-genre after the release of “28 Days Later” and just before Zack Snyder’s “Dawn of the Dead” remake and Edgar Wright’s “Shaun of the Dead” revitalized the zombie movie for the 21st century. In 2006, in the middle of this renewed interest in zombies, Brooks published “World War Z,” an instant success spawning countless imitators and, like every successful book, eventually a movie. While most zombie media before WWZ took a smaller approach mostly focusing on a small group of survivors, WWZ looked at a zombie apocalypse on a global scale, offering multiple points of view as a UN employee gathered first-hand accounts of the zombie war.

Now, Max Brooks returns with a new horror novel, but this time decides to follow up zombies with something entirely different...


Max Brooks

 
If you remember from my last post on this blog, I’m a sucker for the paranormal and Cryptozoology, and in the world of Cryptids, there’s nothing—ahem—bigger than the big guy himself, Bigfoot, or Sasquatch, as some call him.

Bigfoot has grown beyond being a figure of the paranormal and fringe-science and has become something of a staple of American folklore, a sort of new world version of the European Green Man legend symbolizing both harmony with nature but also nature’s wrath. The big, hairy guy has also carved out a nice niche for himself in pop-culture, figuring in commercials, TV shows, and films. Depending on what you watch, Bigfoot is either depicted as a kindly gentle giant or a raging monster, with nothing in between, and there’s an entire sub-genre of straight-to-VOD “Bigfoot attacks” movies.

So when I found out that Max Brooks’ next novel would be a Bigfoot story, I couldn’t wait to see what the man who revolutionized zombie literature would do for Bigfoot. Bigfoot has quite a... spotty literary history, to say the least. There’s no shortage of pseudo-scientific Bigfoot books out there, most of which are just rehashes of Bigfoot eyewitness accounts mixed in with the author’s own theories, as well as outlandish “true” stories which read like lousy fiction that the author was hoping to pass off as real (much like “The Mothman Prophecies.”) There have been a few attempts at Bigfoot horror fiction, with mixed results, and of course, there’s an entire section of Amazon dedicated to Bigfoot erotica for the Kindle, if you’re into that sort of thing (no judgment here if you are).

So anyway, a respected author like Max Brooks taking a stab at Bigfoot was a big deal for me. Apparently, Brooks first developed this story as a film for Legendary pictures but then decided that he wanted to do it as a novel first (Legendary announced that it was once again developing “Devolution” as a film just days after the book was released). So how did Brooks’ fair at writing a horror novel about Bigfoot?


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review***


What I love about this book:

Brooks paints a good picture of city folk who like the idea of getting back to nature but have no idea what that actually entails. This is a story about modern people looking to get in touch with nature while also enjoying all of the conveniences of modern life, only to find out how merciless nature can be. I really enjoyed how the characters in this book had not only to learn how to survive and adapt but also fight against an enemy that no human has ever faced before. Two of my favorite horror movies, Wes Craven’s “The Hills Have Eyes” and Neil Marshall’s “The Descent,” are about normal people who must revert to their most primal nature in order to survive against enemies that have avoided the influence of society, and that’s very much the crux of this story as well. The title of the book, “Devolution,” very much refers to the characters in the story and how they must shed the trappings of modern society, and their own humanity, to survive.

I’ll also give it to Max Brooks—he did his Bigfoot research. The Sasquatches in this novel exhibit behavior that’s commonly detailed in eyewitness accounts like rock throwing, tree knocking, howling, and having an overpowering stench. “Devolution” also contains references to Teddy Roosevelt’s book “The Wilderness Hunter,” in which Roosevelt recounts tales he’s heard of Bigfoot. There are also references to the Ape Canyon incident, something that Brooks seemingly drew a lot of inspiration from, where allegedly miners shot a Bigfoot in an area around Mount St. Helens known as “Ape Canyon.” Then later that night, their cabin was set upon by a group of giant, angry gorilla-like beasts.

The big, hairy invaders are also all given distinctive looks and personalities, which I appreciated, though the Bigfoot in this book fall more into the “raging beast” category of Bigfoot. Brooks made a worldwide zombie plague seem plausible in “World War Z,” and he does the same with Bigfoot in this novel, taking great pains to make his Sasquatches seem like something you could encounter in the woods if you went hiking too far off the beaten path...


What I didn’t love about this book: 

While the Bigfoot in this book are given some depth and personality, I feel like the human characters could have used a little more of that. Most of this story is told through the POV of the character of Kate, detailing the events in her journal, and I feel like the choice to tell this story through one character’s eyes hinders it because a lot of the supporting characters get very little development. Horror stories only work if you’re scared for the characters in the story, and we get plenty of insight into the mind of Kate since she’s the one telling most of the story, but we only get her view of the rest of the characters. Dan, her partner, gets the most development after Kate, followed by Mostar, an artist with a past that gives her unique insight into having to survive.

Sadly, some of the additional side characters all blended together, to the point where I found myself having to refer to earlier in the book to remind myself who a certain character was. We never really get to know a lot of the supporting cast beyond surface-level character traits. While I feel like Brooks wanted some of his characters to come off as shallow and vapid, it leaves the reader uninvested in the story, when bad things start to happen. 

I also could have used a little more growth in Kate and Dan’s relationship. When we first meet them, Dan has grown emotionally distant, which has put a strain on their relationship, but as the story goes, Dan finds new purpose as the town’s “handyman.” Sadly, we don’t really see how this impacts their relationship as the latter half of the book focuses mostly on the conflict with the Bigfoot. Granted, a fight for survival against 7-foot tall apes takes precedent, but I would have liked a few more moments between the main characters growing either closer because of this conflict or it driving a bigger wedge between them.


This preview is an Amazon Affiliate link; 
as an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Author's Website: https://www.maxbrooks.com/

***The Spoiler part of this review***
***Ye be warned to turn back now***

Friday, March 27, 2020

"The Kite Runner," by Khaled Hosseini--Fiction Review

We’re coming to the close of March this Friday, and today’s fiction review is “The Kite Runner” by Khaled Hosseini.

“The Kite Runner” is a literary, recent historical novel and is about the feel-good story of Afghanistan, assuming you’re a sociopath. Seriously, it’s an intimate novel about the lives of characters that lived in the city of Kabul. Taking place before and during the wars starting in the late seventies, which continued in one form or another until—well today. The subject matter covered in this novel gets dark, including war, murder, suicide, death in general, and even rape—so if any of that is going to be a problem for you, best skip this novel, and here’s your ripcord out of this review, here.  

Khaled Hosseini


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review***


What I love about this book:

When most westerners, especially those of us outside of the armed forces, think of Afghanistan, we’re usually thinking of Iraq. I’m guilty of this too—Iraq is just the more prominently focused on conflict in our media. So when we imagine Afghanistan, there is a tendency to think of it as desert hellscape, and when we think of a city in Afghanistan, we think—ruins in a desert hellscape.

But here is Kabul in winter:



You’ll notice first off it’s in the mountains—and it’s not a desert. It turns out the desert hellscape mental picture isn’t accurate—also to ruin it for nearly every war movie/tv show it isn’t all that accurate for Iraq either, but that’s a different topic. I’m going on about this is because I loved how Hosseini corrected my mental picture of Afghanistan, especially with his descriptions of winter in Kabul.

The author also does a great job of illuminating the fact that Kabul wasn’t always a terrifying place. In the early seventies, it even seemed like a reasonably pleasant place. He even describes that there were once regular American tourists who visited during the summers. I love all these details because it drives home the horror of what happens to a place after decades of war and enduring an extreme power vacuum where there is no legitimate government present. 


What I don’t love about this book:

I never grow to love Amir—respect sure—but even though this is an intimate story about his life, I never move past merely liking him, some of the time. He was a spoiled boy, who took for granted his best friend—though as a child never admitted that Hassan was his best friend—and grew into a man capable of doing the right thing, but only begrudgingly. 

The pacing of the novel is slow, which is more just a hallmark of novels that come down more on the literary side than the genre side of the fiction divide. So this is more of an argument that I prefer genre fiction over literary—and is less a comment on this particular story.


***The Spoiler part of this review***
***Ye be warned to turn back now***


The quick and dirty synopsis:

The novel opens with Amir the man—not Amir the boy—and he teases the story of his childhood. A tale of his perceived sins and regrets—the story of how he became what he is today.

Then we are transported back to nineteen seventy-five, and Amir is a boy hanging out with his inseparable companion, Hassan. The two of them are mischief-makers, but Amir points out that the mischief was always his idea, never Hassan’s. This is the dynamic between the two boys, Amir is the rich Pashtun boy, and Hassan is the poor Hazara boy—and Amir’s servant. Not Amir’s friend, Amir is always quick to point out. 

Of the two boys, Amir is the more bookish, but only because he’s literate and Hassan is illiterate. Much to Amir’s chagrin, Hassan is naturally a kinder, wiser soul, and is even loved by Amir’s father, which only stokes Amir’s jealousy. The two boys share a passion for kite fighting, a sport that involves flying kites and using the kite to cut the strings of other people’s kites and is even more brutal than it sounds because the lines of these kites are coated in tar and crushed glass. Then when a kite gets cut down, a mop of people race to claim the downed kite. Amir flies the kites, and Hassan, who has a preternatural talent for it, runs down the kites—hence the title of the novel.

Amir feels he needs to win the big kiting competition to earn his father’s love, because his father, a robust man, is often disappointed in his bookish son, and wishes he were more like the athletic Hassan. During the competition, Hassan, as always, is by Amir’s side and is just as thrilled when Amir wins the competition and has the last kite flying in the sky. Hassan then runs off to claim the last kite Amir cut down, for Amir, after saying “for you, a thousand times over.”

Hassan manages to find the kite, per usual but is waylaid before being able to return home. Amir goes out to find Hassan, worried that he was taking so long. Soon Amir discovers that the local bullies, led by one particularly sociopathic boy, have cornered Hassan in an alley—and are demanding the kite. Hassan, loyal to a fault, won’t give it up because he caught it for Amir, who was cowardly watching all of this from the mouth of the alley. The bullies then hold Hassan down, and the sociopath rapes him.

After that, when Hassan finally makes it home with the kite and gives it to Amir, their relationship dissolves, primarily because of Amir’s guilt. Eventually, Hassan’s father takes the boy away, and they move out of Amir’s father’s house.

Years later, after the Russians have invaded Afghanistan, Amir and his father have to flee the country and eventually end up in California. They go from being wealthy citizens of Kabul to scraping by in the United States. Eventually, Amir marries an Afghani woman whose family had also fled the wars in Afghanistan. Amir and his father finally reconcile before his father’s death, and Amir becomes a writer like he always wanted.

Now, living a good life, Amir gets a phone call from Pakistan, and it’s one of his father’s friends, who was like an uncle to Amir. He tells Amir, “there is a way to be good again,” to entice him to come to Pakistan because he’s aware of what happened between Hassan and Amir.

In Pakistan, Amir hears the story of Hassan’s life and even gets a letter from him. Hassan grew up strong, learned to read and write, found a wife, and had a son and were taking care of Amir’s father’s old house. Then Amir is rocked by several revelations from his father’s friend. Hassan wasn’t just Amir’s loyal friend and servant, but also his illegitimate half brother. He and his wife were also recently murdered by the Taliban, and Amir’s nephew was taken to an orphanage in Kabul. Amir then still had to be convinced, but ultimately, he does decide to brave the road back to Kabul to search for his nephew, where he ends up facing the Taliban. He barely escapes with his and his nephew’s lives.

Still, Amir intended to give his nephew to another orphanage all along, run by an American couple, until he finds out his father’s friend made them up to get Amir to go to Kabul. Again, ultimately, Amir does do the right thing and decides to adopt his nephew but has to find a way to get the psychologically traumatized boy who attempts to commit suicide, out of Pakistan, and to the United States.

When Amir gets his nephew back to California, it isn’t all sunshine and rainbows, all of the psychological trauma is still there, and it colors everything in the boy’s life. The novel does end on a positive note, though, when Amir, his wife, and his nephew are at a gathering of Afghanis living in San Francisco.  At the party, some people are kite fighting, and Amir manages to have a breakthrough with his nephew, and they compete. Then when they cut down their opponent’s kite, before Amir runs off to claim the downed kite, Amir says to his nephew, “for you, a thousand times over.”         


Analysis:

This novel is all about its characters’ relationships during a pivotal period in recent Afghanistan history. In addition to being historical fiction, there is a decent argument to be made that it’s also a family drama—even though neither Amir or Hassan have mother figures. They share a father, unknown to them for all of Hassan’s life, but both lost their mothers in different ways. Amir’s mother died during childbirth, and Hassan’s just left his adoptive father, whom he thought was his birth father. Though, it is nice that she does return into his life for a little while when he was an adult, and she has an adorable relationship with her grandson.

This character work is vital, staging the true horror of this novel, which is what society lost looks like and the depth of despair brought by that loss. It is tough to process the idea of the destruction of a civilization. It’s akin to visualizing a billion of any object. The human mind can’t really do it—so we don’t do it at all, sadly it’s a hole in our experience. Intellectually—unless you’re an asshole—we can reason a billion dead people is a bad thing and should be a sad thing, but the words are sterile, and the emotion doesn’t come. However, when we put a face to it—like when Hassan is dragged into the street by the Taliban. Loyal, Hassan, whose only dreams as an adult were to protect his family and see his brother again, is then shot in the head by some murderous bastard. That evokes an emotion. Especially when they then shoot Hassan’s wife, and get away with it all because there is no law, no justice, because they themselves made sure that there wouldn’t be anymore.

Make no mistake, when someone makes the pseudo-intellectual claim that the world would be a better place if we were just to kill off twenty percent, thirty percent, or whatever number they’d like of the world’s population—they are exactly like the Taliban.     


Parting thoughts:

I am suspicious of my dislike for Amir. It isn’t just that he’s a coward and ostensibly nobody likes a coward. Him being too cowardly to help Hassan in the alley reminds me of an incident in my past. Nobody was raped or even hurt. But there was a time when I stood by as a drunk stranger bullied a friend of mine. I told myself at the time that I was always there, and everyone knew I was present—I was waiting to intervene if anything turned violent. But the thing is—I don’t hate that drunk asshole, I hate my inaction, and who I was at that moment. That is why I suspect I never came around fully with Amir. He reminds me too much of myself during a moment in time I would rather forget.

Friday, February 21, 2020

"We Were Liars," by E. Lockhart--Fiction Review

This Friday, my dear internet strangers, we’re in for a sad one titled, “We Were Liars” by E. Lockhart.

It’s a teen/YA book about family, love gained and lost, and death…and rainbows—well, not that last part, but I thought I should inject some levity here. Like a clown, everyone loves clowns!

E. Lockhart


***The Non-Spoiler part of this review***


What I love about this book:

I was all prepared to not like this book, and it won me over. After all, it’s from the point of view of some rich white girl describing her trials and tribulations of her summers living on her waspy wealthy family’s private island off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard. So I was dismayed when Cadence and her cousins started worming their way past my thinky bits and into my feely bits. This might sound like a reason to not love this novel, but I hold it up as evidence of the author’s skill to get me to relate to characters I usually wouldn’t like.

This novel uses the unreliable narrator literary device in such a way that while early on, you’re kind of aware of it—the title talks about liars after all—but it’s still devastating when the grand illusion is shattered. I often reread novels, usually because I want to re-live a particular story, but there is no going backward with “We Were Liars” it’s impossible to have a similar experience the second read through. I recently reread this novel, marathoning it while I was bedridden and not feeling well—a state of being eerily similar to Cadence’s normal. So during that time, knowing the twists and turns, it was exquisitely evident to me that this book was designed to be a completely different story on subsequent read-throughs. This is a writing feat I find massively impressive.   


What I don’t love about this book:

Short chapters—I know it’s a weird thing to not like, but I typically read a lot of books simultaneously, and when one book has short chapters, it throws off my timing when I switch books. The whole story is from Cadence’s point of view as though she is writing the novel, so I found myself saying out loud a few times, “walking into a new god damn room doesn’t require a new chapter, Cady!” I know this is a little off-topic, but my ideal chapter takes fifteen to twenty-five minutes to read, and the sooner the rest of the world conforms to this—the better. In my own writing, I go the other way, rarely keeping to this rule, because my prolixness is unending, but this is a do as I say, not as I do sort of thing.


***The Spoiler part of this review***
***Ye be warned to turn back now***


The quick and dirty synopsis:

This isn’t synopsis yet, and I know I just did my spoiler warning, but seriously, if you haven’t read this book yet, I’d go read it first before continuing. Once you know the ending, you can’t really see it any other way.

So for those of you still here—the book starts off with Cadence Sinclair Eastman, describing how her father left her and her “mummy” and then apparently shoots Cadence right in the chest with a handgun on the front lawn. Except that he didn’t. This is just a graphic metaphor Cadence uses to describe the feeling of him leaving. It’s also the first indication that Cady, as her family affectionately calls her, can be a bit light on the truth when she tells a story.

The story moves on to describing Cadence’s time living on her family’s private island during the summers, where she spent most of her time with her cousins close to her own age Johnny and Mirren, and eventually Johnny’s friend Gat, who is Indian. As the years go on, the four of them are inseparable during the summers and get a reputation for mischief amongst the family—hence the nickname the liars. Gat and Cady even fall into a young love romance, the kind which is all passion and nobody is entirely confident what the other person wants and so on.

Then during the summer, when they were fifteen, Cadence is in some sort of accident. The details are fuzzy to her because she has a form of amnesia, and is relating the events after the fact. Cadence doesn’t return to the island next year. Instead, she goes on an extended summer trip to Europe with her father, the guy who definitely didn’t shoot her at the beginning of the book. The journey doesn’t go exactly well, she misses the liars, and she still has crippling migraines related to her “accident.”  

The next year, Cady and her mother return to the island for the summer, her Grandfather’s house has been rebuilt as something new, and foreign to Cadence. Cady meets up with the rest of the liars at cuddledown—one of the houses on the island—and they resume their old life together, and Cadence finds she is still desperately in love with Gat. The rest of the family are living in the three other houses on the island, so Cady and the liars have plenty of time alone together at cuddledown.

The liars try to slowly help Cadence remember summer fifteen, throughout the summer, since she’s lost most of her memories of that whole summer and not just her accident. She gets bits and pieces, here and there as they hang out, in the house, on the beach, etc. Soon she realizes that the whole of summer fifteen wasn’t very good. Her mother and aunts got drunk and fought continuously that summer over their father, and their inheritance, and Cadence’s dead grandmother’s possessions.

It becomes clear to Cady that the family had been on the verge of breaking up during summer fifteen. The liars were being pitted against each other by their mothers, to try to win better terms in their Grandfather’s will. Gat was going to be sent away because Cadence’s Grandfather didn’t approve of her relationship with him for purely racist reasons, and everything was a mess.

Then Cadence realizes that her “accident” happened because of an ill-conceived attempt to save the family and get the aunts to stop fighting over their inheritance. The liars had decided to burn down Cady’s Grandfather’s house when everyone else was off the island. Then the first tragic revelation happens, Cadence realizes that when they did that, they accidentally killed her Grandfather’s dogs. Then the other shoe drops and Cadence realizes that the other liars also died in that fire, and she was the only survivor.

The book ends with Cadence talking to her liars, who have been dead for nearly all of the book, one last time. Then they swim off into the sunset, having done what they were there for, helping Cady remember and move past her survivor’s guilt.        

        
Analysis:

This book is many things, it’s romantic, and a family drama, but mainly it’s about power and how it can be illusory. Cadence’s Grandfather holds all the power in the family, and all of his daughters become pretty awful people trying to win his favor. This is what leads the liars to burn down his house, in a foolish attempt to seize power and save the family. In the end, all their righteous bravado was really idiocy masquerading as bravery—helped along by underage drinking—and all it led to was a tragedy.

After the revelation that Cadence’s cousins and Gat are dead, and have been for most of the book, everything before that moment is suddenly and violently reframed. It truly is worth going back and rereading the whole novel at that point because, like I said in the non-spoiler section of this review, it is an entirely different novel the second time. A whole bunch of weird conversations and unlikely events suddenly make sense, and understanding Cadence’s delusions enhance the tragedy of the entire experience.

A fascinating detail is the degradation of the cuddledown house as the story progresses because that house serves as the de facto base of the liars. As the plot marches along and toward the big revelation, cuddledown is described as becoming messier and messier. The first time reading it, I thought, wow, these kids are slobs, but after knowing that the liars are all dead save Cady, the mess suddenly makes a whole new terrible sense. It isn’t the messy clubhouse of four teenagers. It’s the trashed domain of one severely depressed young woman. When people are clinically depressed, it’s incredibly common for them to not clean up after themselves. This is one of those excellent set of details that reframes after you gain more information by progressing through the plot.

There is an argument to be made that cuddledown is haunted by the ghosts of the liars, especially because Cadence’s younger cousin Taft even claims to her that it’s haunted, and it’s more than implied he sees his dead sister there too. However, I think it’s more likely that he, like Cadence, is having a hard time reconciling her death and shares her delusions on some level.    


Parting thoughts:

I’m not super proud to admit this, but I never knew where Martha’s Vineyard was until I read this book, and I definitely didn’t realize it was an island. Certainly, I’d heard of the place many times in passing, but for some reason, I always associated it with Martha Stewart or sometimes as a place in California—both are equally stupid for different reasons.

Finally, this book was initially recommended to me by a friend after I had just finished reading, “The Road,” and one of the books in the Red Rising series, and I had expressed a desire for lighter emotional fare. She suggested this, proving she has just as sick a sense of humor as me. She claims she didn’t realize the context of her recommendation at the time, but I have my doubts. Regardless, I think it’s an excellent book, and you should read it too—but maybe not if you’re in the mood for a feel-good story.